There is a CSI-Connect thread on this topic. Feel free to weigh in!
There is a longstanding and difficult question at most CSI regional and chapter meetings, which was mirrored at the recent National Conference: How do we get more members into CSI?
That is tough to answer, and I don’t plan on doing so in this one article. But I do want to offer at least one partial solution.
It is crystal clear that we as an AECO (Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Owner) professional association) need to bring more contractors into the fold.
Though I am not working as a contractor now (I am Director of Industry Development and Technical Services at the International Masonry Institute), for about 13 years I did work as a contractor.
Sometimes I worked for General Contractors (GC’s), and other years for commercial and large subcontractors. I was mainly a Project Manager. So I am looking at this from that end of the table.
We all know that overall CSI has very few contractors that are members. National statistics say 15% of CSI members are contractors/ construction companies.
At the Nashville conference, only 6% of attendees were contractors. Wow….
https://www.csiresources.org/blogs/peter-kray/2021/09/26/csi-national-conference-reunites-industry-puts-opp?CommunityKey=80c3b4dd-0d3f-4d4e-90f2-3bc6e4135dc2
It’s easy to say that we need more contractors as members. But the real question is: Why would they join? What can CSI specifically do for general contractors and/or subcontractors?
When I was a contractor, I did come to my share of CSI meetings. That is where I first learned about CSI.
I went to a few NH and Boston meetings. And each time there was some practical and/or business development benefit to me being there, as a contractor.
I didn’t “need” to get an AIA LU on proper window flashing, but I did need to install it correctly on buildings, and I was liable for such. So, it benefitted me to learn what I could from designers and manufacturer representatives.
General contractors certainly want to meet with architects, and usually they will have some level of interest in nearly all the products reps and vendors. Subcontractors may be a little harder to find a regular fit within CSI, especially those trade contractors that are not that large.
Product reps want to meet and speak with (and sell to) general contractors. Likewise, architects are typically open to learning about and meeting some new GCs/CMs.
For contractors (general and subs), their annual costs for joining some of the other industry groups is typically much higher than what the CSI annual dues are ($375), so I don’t feel that the entrance cost is a large barrier.
What do others think? What have others already been doing? Is this branch of AEC a potential growth opportunity for the Construction Specifications Institute?